Can Education Be Made A Science? ? ALTERNATIVES

No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong. -- Albert Einstein

Let?s specify more precisely what the question of the title, ?Can Education Be Made A Science?, is intended to mean. It should be understood to ask, ?Can technology and methods be developed which will give us (human beings) control over the production of outcomes designated by educational goal statements??

We can put this question more cogently by breaking it into several related questions:

a. Can we cause people (the average person?) to learn? That is
b. Can we cause people to be either moral, skilled, or well-behaved?
c. Can we cause them to be this way whether or not they want to be this way? i.e. against their will.
d. Better yet, can we cause them to want to be this way? (Advertising seem to manage to do this surprisingly well -- check your teenager?s clothing,)

The short answer to all of these questions is: it all depends. What might surprise you is what it depends on.

The first big, very big thing an education science would depend on is

1. our conceiving of educational goals whose outcomes would be the effects of our solely our actions.

For example, suppose a religious community chose as a goal of education, ?Being accepted by God into Heaven.? If they also believed that it is by God?s grace alone that people achieve such acceptance, then, logically they must relinquish the hope of a science of education, since to imagine that humans have the power to compel God to accept them contradicts this belief.

Two other conditions, no small things, either, are:

2. that there be a workable consensus on goal outcomes (and the steps toward them); and
3. that the outcomes be unambiguously defined. (This crucial step is too technical to discuss in a blog. See the article and linked articles given in the reference below.)

Many an educational reform proposal has died for failing to meet conditions 2 or 3. Just consider the widely encounted goal statement, ?Prepare the student for the 21st Century.? Who knows what is being specified here? And how many people agree on it? Would it have come to be a political issue in the U.S. if much of any consensus existed?

If we are desperate to answer, ?yes,? to the question as to whether education could be made a science, we might hope that the words science and education slip from their traditional moorings and come to be applicable in ways that satisfy us.

Advertising campaigns might help. Celebrities might be pressed into service to convince people that educators are primarily scientific technicians, rather that the kind of magician they are often made out to be in the sitcoms. (See Technician, or Magician: Can You Tell the Difference?) Free promotional samples of technology would no doubt be welcomed by cash-strapped school districts whose political governors are almost always happy to concede on the minor matter of language: ?science?? ?education?? Whatever!

For references and to examine these issues further, see Can There Be a Science of Education?

Cordially
--- EGR

Source: http://newfoundations.com/AltBlog/?p=160

fsu football ted kennedy warren zevon caroline kennedy caroline kennedy day of rage sportscenter